Introduction
On April 2, 2025, the Lok Sabha passed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, with 288 votes in favor and 232 against, following a 12-hour debate that concluded at 2 AM. The bill has sparked considerable debate due to its potential impact on waqf property management, governance, and religious autonomy. This article provides a structured analysis of the bill’s provisions, advantages, criticisms, affected stakeholders, political reactions, and its historical context.
Table Of Content
- Introduction
- Understanding the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025
- Advantages and Disadvantages
- Advantages
- Disadvantages
- Who Will Be Affected?
- Political Reactions: Support and Opposition
- Historical Context
- Impact on Waqf Property Management
- Public Reaction & Social Media Sentiment
- Comparative Analysis: Waqf Act vs. Other Religious Endowment Laws
- Comparative Analysis: Waqf Act vs. Other Laws
- Conclusion
- Key Citations
Understanding the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025
The Waqf Bill, 2025, amends the Waqf Act, 1995, which regulates properties endowed for religious or charitable purposes under Islamic law. The bill introduces key changes, including:
- Non-Muslim Representation: Permits non-Muslims to serve on Waqf Boards and the Central Waqf Council.
- Survey Oversight: Replaces Survey Commissioners with District Collectors for property surveys.
- Gender Inclusion: Mandates at least two Muslim women on Waqf Boards.
- Legislative Renaming: Changes the name to the United Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development (UWMEED) Act, 1995.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages:
- Improved Governance: Collector-led surveys may enhance efficiency and prevent mismanagement.
- Gender Equality: Ensures women’s representation in decision-making.
- Efficient Dispute Resolution: Appeals to High Courts within 90 days could streamline legal proceedings.
Disadvantages:
- Reduced Muslim Representation: Critics argue that increased non-Muslim inclusion undermines religious autonomy.
- Legal and Constitutional Challenges: Opposition parties claim the bill contradicts Article 26 of the Indian Constitution.
- Potential Land Grabbing: Concerns over government intervention in waqf properties.
Who Will Be Affected?
- Waqf Boards & Mutawallis: Changes in board composition may alter governance structures.
- Muslim Communities: Possible disruption in managing mosques, madrasas, and charitable trusts.
- Non-Muslims: Newly included in governance roles, which could be seen as interference in religious matters.
- Government Authorities: Collectors’ involvement in surveys may lead to conflicts over property classification.
Political Reactions: Support and Opposition
The bill has polarized political parties, with:
- Supporters: BJP, JDU, and AJSU defend the bill as beneficial for minority welfare and governance.
- Opponents: Congress, DMK, SP, and AAP argue it undermines Muslim autonomy and is unconstitutional.
Historical Context
The governance of waqf properties has evolved through multiple legislations, including the Waqf Act of 1954 and the amendments in 2013 aimed at digitization and transparency. The 2025 bill incorporates recommendations from a Joint Parliamentary Committee and seeks to modernize waqf management.
Impact on Waqf Property Management
The bill’s provisions may streamline waqf property management by resolving disputes through Collector-led surveys and reducing the mandatory contribution to Waqf Boards. However, opposition fears land-grabbing and retrospective changes could lead to legal complexities.
Public Reaction & Social Media Sentiment
Social media has seen divided opinions, with #WaqfBill trending on X. Supporters hail it as reformative, while critics claim it targets minorities. Prominent opposition leaders allege the bill facilitates land acquisition by industrialists.
Comparative Analysis: Waqf Act vs. Other Religious Endowment Laws
Unlike Hindu and Sikh religious endowment laws, which require members of respective faiths, the amended Waqf Act introduces non-Muslim participation. This deviation raises concerns over religious autonomy and governance consistency.
Comparative Analysis: Waqf Act vs. Other Laws
To contextualize, here’s a comparison with other religious endowment laws, highlighting the unique changes:
Table 1: Composition of Waqf Boards in the Act and Bill
| Parameter | Waqf Act, 1995 | Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Total members | 8-12 Members | Up to 11 members |
| Nature of appointment | Elected and nominated, all Muslim | All nominated |
| Change in composition | Elected (1-2 from each): Muslim MPs, MLAs/MLCs, Bar Council members, Mutawallis | Nominated, can be non-Muslim: 1 chairperson, 1 MP, 1 MLA, 2 professionals, 1 officer, 1 Bar Council member, 1 Muslim professional, 2 scholars (Shia/Sunni), 1 Muslim officer, 1 Mutawalli, 1 Islamic theology scholar, 2 Panchayat/Municipality members |
Table 2: Comparison of various laws governing religious and charitable institutions
| Acts | Board Requirement | CEO/Commissioner/Executives Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 | All Rajya Dharmika Parishat members Hindu | Commissioners/Executive Officer must be Hindu |
| Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious and Endowments Act, 1987 | 13/21 Andhra Pradesh Dharmika Parishad members Hindu | Executive Officer must be Hindu |
| The Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 | All Board members Sikh | All Executive Committee members Sikh |
Table 3: Comparison of Waqf Act with the Indian Trusts Act
| Parameter | Waqf Act, 1995 | Indian Trusts Act, 1882 |
|---|---|---|
| Donor/Creator | Any person competent to contract (Bill restricts to Muslims) | Any person eligible to enter into contracts |
| Object of donation | Any movable or immovable property | Any movable or immovable property |
| Instruments of donation | Declaration, long-term use, endowment when line ends | Written declaration and registration, or transfer to Trustee |
| Use | Religious, pious, or charitable per Muslim law | Must be created for a lawful purpose |
| Testamentary capacity | Muslim cannot dispose >1/3 property by will* | Muslim cannot dispose >1/3 property by will* |
| Administrator | Mutawalli | Trustee, can delegate in writing |
| Governance system | State Waqf Boards | Some states have Charities Commissioner** |
| Dispute resolution | Waqf Tribunals | Civil Courts |
*In accordance with Shariat Act of 1937. **E.g., Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Bombay Public Trusts (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1961.
These tables, sourced from PRS India, illustrate the bill’s departure from traditional religious autonomy, fueling debates on secular governance.
Conclusion
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, represents a significant shift in the management of waqf properties in India. While proponents highlight its governance improvements, critics warn of potential constitutional conflicts and religious interference. As debates continue, the bill’s long-term impact on religious autonomy, property rights, and minority welfare remains to be seen.
Key Citations
- Waqf Amendment Bill Detailed Analysis PRS India
- Waqf Bill Live Updates India Today
- Lok Sabha Passes Waqf Bill Parties Support Oppose Times of India
- Waqf Amendment Bill Wikipedia Overview
- Waqf Bill Controversy Amendments NDA vs INDIA Mint
- Waqf Amendment Bill Discussion Rajya Sabha News On Air
- Waqf Amendment Bill Live Updates Political Pulse Indian Express
No Comment! Be the first one.